comparisons

Comments sections, SEO and the static-site trade we made

Everything on this site is static files at the edge. No comments, no tracking pixels, no analytics SDK. The reasoning is the product promise, compiled.

ProofTune Project··3 min read
Comparisons illustration Comparisons

What we gained by omission

  • Zero cookies, zero banners: nothing here tracks you, so nothing here needs your consent to track you. The absence is the feature.
  • Speed as integrity: no ad-tech waterfall means the page parses in one network round-trip; proves rather than says “we don't phone home.”
  • Freshness by design: a proper release document workflow replaces comment-fueled “is this still true” — posts date themselves and the baseline sitemap says so.

The feedback channel we chose

Support bundles, opt-in diagnostic bundles and the security address — channels where a conversation has an artifact attached instead of a thread that ages into misinformation. Writing your own product page this way is a quality stance for a tool, not a website trend: visitors evaluating a silent local binary deserve silence from the marketing site too.

ProofTune ProjectEngineering notes — every claim here names the bytes a real tool touches. Verify first, install second.
ProofTune logo

See these exact settings inside the real tool

The browser replica runs the same strings and states as the installed app — click around before you ever install anything.